03/20/13 - CounterPunch - The Cuban Blogger and the "Big Bad Wolf": The Curious Case of Yoani Sanchez
by BENJAMIN WILLIS and MARIA ISABEL ALFONSO
Yoani Sanchez' long-awaited arrival to the United States has been heralded
as a victory for the opposition in Cuba and an example of how citizen
journalists, armed with social media, can bring about democratic change in
authoritarian societies. However, a closer look at the circumstances of
her international journey and the difference of the receptions she has had
so far in the United States and the rest of the world generates far more
questions than it does answers.
Yoani's meteoric rise as "award-wining" blogger has drawn as much suspicion
as it has admiration. Her blog, Generación Y, has been championed by some
members of the Cuban exile community and by certain opportunistic academic
and journalistic circles because of her constant criticism of the Cuban
government and its control over freedom of expression and assembly. Her
confrontational discourse and blunt condemnation of Cuba's official line is
"red meat" for a great part of the exile community while her call for
freedom of expression is an easy bandwagon for liberals to jump onto.
However, not all of the historic exile community is in favor of her
statements. The most recalcitrant faction has strenuously disapproved of
the comments she has made from the beginning of her journey.
An historical understanding of Cuba's reality in general, and its current
and past relationship with the United States in particular, has led several
intellectuals, journalists, and common citizens to question her motives and
her resources. Hardly ever before has somebody with so little experience
and output garnered so many international accolades so fast. The fact that
so many of these awards come from countries that have actively pursued
policies of usurping Cuban sovereignty only adds to the intrigue of Yoani's
Salim Lamrani published "40 questions for Yoani Sanchez on her World Tour"
in Opera Mundi on February 19th and many of them are exactly the type of
queries that one must ask if one is to understand how Yoani could create so
much of an international presence from a country that she repeatedly claims
has such limited access to the internet. Here are some of the questions
posed by Lamrani:
13. How can your blog accept Paypal, a payment system not available to any
island resident because of economic sanctions that affect, among other
16. How are you able to register your domain through the U.S. company
GoDaddy when this is formally forbidden under current economic sanctions?
17. Your blog is available in 18 languages including; English, French,
Spanish, Italian, German, Portuguese, Russian, Slovenian, Polish, Chinese,
Japanese, Lithuanian, Czech, Bulgarian, Dutch, Finnish, Korean and Greek.
No other Web site in the world, not even the sites of important
international agencies, such as the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, OECD or
the European Union offers this degree of linguistic support. Not even the
U.S. State Department or the CIA offers this degree of access to
non-English speakers. Who finances the translations?
18. How is it possible that the site that hosts your blog offers bandwidth
60 times greater than the Internet access service Cuba offers to its users?
24. In 2011, you published 400 messages per month. The price of sending one
SMS message from Cuba is $1.25. So, you spent $7,000 in one year of Twitter
use. Who pays for this?
When asked about this list during her visit to Columbia University's School
of Journalism she joked that when she was in Brazil the list had grown to
fifty questions and that she had already answered all of them. These
questions though are not just for Yoani to brush off but are rhetorical
questions that thinking people ought to ask when looking at her website and
the production methods of "Team Yoani". Indeed, the first stop on her
80-day Phineas Fogg-like trip produced plenty of questions and Yoani's
answers belied the fact that maybe she wasn't exactly "ready for
Upon her arrival in Brazil, Yoani was greeted by the stark reality that
many global citizens do not agree with her narrative. She was challenged by
Brazilian journalists, students, and other citizens about her description
of Cuban reality and her answers to three questions in particular caused
her to backtrack almost immediately.
When asked about the U.S. embargo against Cuba, Yoani stated unequivocally
that it was an interventionist policy and was a justification for the
failings of the Cuban government. Most importantly she emphasized that this
policy of economic strangulation was a "relic of the Cold War" and needed
to be abandoned as soon as possible ("Ya!"). She also called upon the
closing of Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. Not the detention center that has
brought so much infamy to the United States government and has challenged
our notion of due process, but the actual base which is a violation of
Cuban sovereignty. Lastly, she called for the release of the Cuban
operatives known as the Cuban Five arguing that the Cuban government has
spent an unnecessary portion of its budget to campaign for their release.
When confronted by Miami Cubans who were incensed by such commentary Yoani
began to backpedal by saying that her comments about the Cuban Five were
"ironic" and that she believes that they are not innocent. This
rationalization poses a problem for the legitimacy of her position.
For example, now that she has arrived in the United States her position
towards the embargo and Guantanamo has been mitigated to a milquetoast
generalization that there should be a "dialogue" about these issues. Why is
she advocating for dialogue now instead of demanding for the termination of
unilateral sanctions as she did in Brazil? Why does she not also decry the
interventionist nature of USAID programs that are specifically aimed at
"regime change" in Cuba? Why are these questions not being asked in New
York, or more pointedly, why aren't the institutions and academics not
letting them be asked? The "guardians" at NYU and Columbia have shown a
tendency to "cherry-pick" the questions directed towards Yoani. Why, in
what is supposedly the freest nation on earth, is this happening? There
have been protests and outbursts in her meetings but no direct challenge
has been allowed that would put her in a position of explaining her
vacillating views on such important topics.
Now, she has expounded on her desire to establish an independent online
newspaper upon her return to the island. On the surface, this idea seems
laudable and is far overdue to empower civil society in Cuba. But if one
stops and ruminates upon what the basic necessities for setting up an
organization like this entails then several more questions arise that must
be added to the already long list for Yoani.
One person in New York held up a sign that read "Press isn't free, It's
just cheap." We are in an age where almost every "newspaper" on the planet
is struggling to survive and where hegemonic corporate ownership of the
airwaves, webpages, and what's left of print media is almost complete. The
few independent news sources remaining rely heavily on donations and
subscriptions from their supporters and consumers. Also major funding comes
from federal grants. Even Wikileaks and Counterpunch depend on donations.
There is nothing wrong with this type of support but in the case of Cuba
there simply isn't the financial resources for this type of publication to
operate with domestic funds. Most likely, she won't receive any help from
the Cuban government. So, in other words, the idea of an independent news
source in Cuba, by default, has to be funded by foreign investment.
Therefore, from the inception of such a project, "independent" is a
questionable qualifier. Donations are a legitimate source of income for
such an enterprise as long as they don't come with strings attached.
Is Yoani so independently wealthy from the monetary awards that she is
going around collecting on this trip that she can bankroll such an
operation? The regulations of the U.S. embargo wouldn't allow corporate
control from the U.S. and would seriously deter a foreign corporation from
backing the digital publication because of the extraterritorial
ramifications of the Helms-Burton Act.
In an ironic twist of fate, will she have to depend on absolute communism
for such a newspaper to succeed? Will her employees and associates work
full time for free in order to bring such an ambitious project to fruition?
Only in communist Cuba could that happen.
This past Tuesday Yoani was invited to Washington D.C. to meet with members
of Congress and speak at the Cato Institute, where she again reiterated the
need to end the embargo. But instead of making the obvious case that the
embargo was a determent to the development of her people, she called it an
"excuse" and stated at the Cato Institutue that: "I would love to see how
the official propaganda apparatus would function without this big bad wolf.
I doubt that it could."
The reference to the "big bad wolf" may remind the reader of the fact that
he was not the fictional wolf in the tale of the "Boy Who Cried Wolf" but a
dangerous menace who repeatedly came to destroy the homes and lives of the
three little pigs. That is exactly what the embargo has done. It has
destroyed the lives, homes, and infrastructure of the Cuban nation while
mockingly espousing that it fosters "democracy" and is intended to "help"
those it harms.
If this cynical reasoning is what it takes to dismantle the embargo, then
more power to her. The embargo may be a crutch for the Cuban government to
lean upon but it also has had very real effects on the island's populace
and Yoani can't claim to be a spokesperson for her people if she can't
articulate that very obvious fact.
Despite her tepid argument for lifting the embargo, she was more than
pleased to have met with the very members of the Cuban-American faction of
the House that have done everything in their power to continue that policy,
who were more than happy to fawn over her in return. Their visceral hate
for the Cuban government is enough for them to overlook the fact that they
disagree about the "effectiveness" of the embargo. Will Yoani demand that
the United States lift the embargo and stop financing regime change
operations that put ordinary Cuban citizens in peril for the remainder of
her trip? Will she call on president Obama to remove Cuba from the State
Sponsors of Terrorism list while in the U.S.?
In April she is scheduled to be in Miami where a tribute will be paid to
her work. She will be presented with a medal and will speak at the
questionably named Torre de la Libertad (Liberty Tower). Will she exercise
her freedom of speech and tell an audience that will include the most
hardcore anti-Castro Cuban-Americans that the embargo is an interventionist
policy and has to be lifted Ya!, that the Cuban Five be liberated, and that
the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo be shut down and the land that it
occupies given back to Cuba? Will she speak out against the historical
oppression of diversity of thought within that same community towards
notable figures such as the recently deceased Francisco Aruca, a victim of
bomb threats and other heinous violence and character assassination? Will
she denounce the violence that has been perpetrated by the radical factions
within Miami's exile community such as the bombing of Cubana flight 455 in
1976 and the other blatant acts of terrorism that have been linked to such
vile characters as Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles? Will she ask
Marco Rubio if he was serious when he compared Cuba to a zoo?
Will she plead for a Miami that allows pluralism and freedom of expression
with the same conviction that she does in Cuba? Or, will she be a victim of
her own self-censorship?
Benjamin Willis is a musician.
Maria Isabel Alfonso, PhD. is Associate Professor at St. Joseph's College
in New York. They are married and raising their nine-month old son in
Queens on malanga, Los Van Van, and baseball. They are founding members of
CAFE, Cuban Americans for Engagement. They can be reached at
firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com
CUBA-L FAIR USE NOTICE
This server contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of Cuba's political, economic, human rights, international, cultural, educational, scientific, sports and historical issues, among others. We distribute the materials on the basis of a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. The material is distributed without profit. The material should be used for information, research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/17/107.shtml.