03/09/08 - Cuba-L Analysis (Albuquerque) - Cuba and Information Technology - 2001[Part 1] by Nelson P Valdes [Cuba-L Direct is providing our readers with this unpublished report that was written seven years ago. The report was prepared for the Ford Foundation by the Cuba Research & Analysis Group. Despite the 2001 date the basic concepts and history are accurate and useful. Hopefully, the series will help frame any discussion on the subject today]. INTRODUCTION This report provides a current, brief overview of the availability and use of email and the Internet in Cuba today. It offers the most up-to-date information on available resources and access. It raises some of the current political arguments used to explain the limitations of resources, and provides alternative explanations placing the island within the context of the problems faced by developing countries. The report also outlines the Cuban model of digital inclusion, which seeks to integrate the country into the global Information and Computer Technology (ICT) revolution. This report does not attempt to present a historical account of the origins and development of email and Internet services in Cuba as such studies have been done already. DIGITAL DIVIDE AND THE HOUSEHOLD; INDICATOR BIAS When addressing Internet access, be it in Cuba or elsewhere, we should be sensitive to the problem of selecting an appropriate indicator so as to avoid bias. Typically, studies about access to Internet connectivity have concentrated on measuring households and individual access. The best example of that approach has been Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion, a series of reports written by the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration.[1] The work shows a significant "digital divide" in the United States determined by income, ethnicity, race, age and place of residence. Although the work makes an important contribution to a discussion of the problem of inclusion, it suffers from a fundamental bias: it is intellectually framed by an individualistic and market oriented perspective characteristic of a highly developed post-industrial society. When one uses the household as the centerpiece of a measure of Internet connectivity, then one depends on individual household income and leaves out other possible avenues of Internet inclusion. One study has shown that in the major industrial countries, "Home continues to be the primary place for accessing the web (70%), although a good number of people access from work (57%), and about a third access from other locations such as schools, libraries, hotels, remote business centers, etc."[2] The "household indicator bias" might be useful as a measure in postindustrial societies but it is neither useful nor persuasive as an objective indicator in the less developed world. If Internet and email access are measured primarily by counting households with a computer, a modem, a telephone and an Internet account, significant sectors of the world population will be overlooked because they are not able to afford such things. In fact, in 1999, using those indicators only 2.4% of the population of the world had Internet access.[3] Even in the United States it has been recognized that the individual household approach might not be the wisest way of closing the digital divide. That is why in 1996 the U.S. Congress adopted the Telecommunication Law that had a special provision that intended to reduce costs for Internet access in schools and libraries. In other words, social/community institutions were selected to address the bias of stressing the individual household. Moreover, the federal and state governments in the United States have noted the need to create and/or expand Community Technology Centers in low-income urban and rural neighborhoods. Access and inclusion, in other words, would not occur by means of individualized, privatized, household-bound solutions within populations that could not afford connectivity. The number of users is a basic and seemingly comprehensible measure of Internet access. But there is no standard definition of what is a user of email or of the Internet. Moreover, comparisons of user data are misleading because there is no standard definition of frequency (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly) or services used (e.g., e-mail, World Wide Web). How frequent does one have to use email to be defined as a user?[4]. Statistical information including that cited within this report should be considered mere approximations of patterns of use and connectivity. DIGITAL DIVIDE AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD Whether measured individually or socially, at the end of the 1990s the share of Internet users of the richest 20% of the world's population was 93.3% while the remaining 80% shared 6.7% of Internet access.[5] Despite the exponential growth in Internet connectivity, the stratified pattern has not changed. According to the International Labor Organization study World Employment Report 2001: Life at Work in the Information Society, the gap between the digital haves and have-nots has increased over the years. Computer usage and Internet access grows at an extraordinary pace in some parts of the world but "it remains the case that little more than 5 per cent of the world's population are Internet users - and 88 per cent of these are in the industrialized countries." The U.S. and Canada account for 57 per cent of the world's Internet users, Africa and the Middle East together account for only 1 per cent. Almost 90% of the world population does not have a phone line, and even less people owned a computer. E-mail or the Internet is not a viable possibility, at least not on an individual basis.[6] A United Nations expert commission has noted that the disparity is so great that "there are more hosts in New York than in continental Africa; more hosts in Finland than in Latin America and the Caribbean."[7] Yet, even in western Europe there is a major digital divide. Pippa Norris discloses that, "at present the information society has not spread evenly throughout postindustrial economies. Instead, there are major differences between leaders and laggards even within the European Union. Far from equalizing the playing field between European societies, the adoption of new technology has so far exacerbated a north-south divide that already existed in traditional patterns of mass media use."[8] What is true for western Europe and most of the developing world is also the case in Latin America. In fact, if we were to use the household index of Internet access, then only 2.1% of all Latin American households have connectivity. In the year 2000 there were 10.5 million Internet users in Latin America, with 72% residing in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and Chile (Brazil accounted for 50% of all users). National Internet access merely reproduces the stratified nature of their respective societies. Internet is available, as a rule, to only those who can afford to have it. Internet usage throughout Latin America is determined by the cost and availability of telecommunications and by people's income.[9] Abraham Lowenthal in an essay looking at Latin America at the end of the century concluded that, "Income distribution, long more unequal in Latin America than in any other region, has become even more skewed. The richest 10 percent of Latin America's population receive 40 percent of the region's income, while the poorest 30 percent receive just 7.5 percent."[10] Hence, it is highly doubtful that 200 million Latin Americans will have the financial ability to purchase connectivity. It is important to consider the issue of income and pricing when attempting to project the United States experience onto the developing world. North-American households can buy an unlimited local call package for as little as $3 to $7 a month and get access to the Internet via a dial-up service for about $15 to $20 per month. In early 2001 U.S. Internet rates were down to U.S.$4.95 a month plus $20 for typical phone time, while in Latin America the regional average cost was twice that amount. In the case of high use of different telecom services by an individual consumer, business or institution, the gap between North and South dramatically increases. In 1999 in the U.S. a package of unlimited Internet access could produce a monthly bill of as little as $20-45. But a similar package became $100 in Brazil, $165 in Mexico, $171 in Argentina and $302 in Bolivia. Poorer nations are more likely to have higher overall costs of connectivity, along with less individual households that can afford long term Internet connectivity.[11] The same occurs with computers. It has been reported, "according to global market researchers IDC, personal computers have only penetrated 5% of Latin America's population, including home, business, education and government settings." Of these, only about 30% have Internet capability.[12] The social and economic inequalities found throughout Latin America further contribute to the digital divide. The exclusion from access to email and the Internet reflects and also reinforces those very profound social differences found in the region.[13] At present (2001) 13 million persons have Internet connectivity in Latin America, about 3% of the adult population; most of the accounts are individual in nature.[14] The United Nations Development Program has noted that in the developing countries "market forces alone will not rectify the imbalance" in the digital divide.[15] The Cuban case should be analyzed within this context, especially since Cuba offers a very different approach from the rest of Latin America when addressing questions of social equity and inclusion. Numerous scholarly studies have noted that since 1959 the Cuban government has stressed policies seeking to generate as much equity as possible.[16] Access and inclusion have been driving forces on matters related to education, healthcare and other social services. The question then is whether Cuba has practiced a policy of inclusion in the areas of telecommunications and information technology. Telecommunications inclusion, however, should be understood not in terms of universal access but rather as universal service.[17] CUBA AND ITS TECHNICAL CONNECTION WITH THE WWW In order to discuss access to email or the Internet in Cuba, it is necessary to have a clear idea of the external limitations imposed by the U.S. on Cuban connectivity. Cuban international telecommunications up until 1959 were dependent on cables across the Florida Straits. The Cuban telephone system was essentially an appendage of U.S.-based telephone service. Cuban telecommunications capacity was dependent on U.S. technology and technical support. This changed rather abruptly with the economic embargo imposed by the U.S. against Cuba. Since 1962 Cuba has been prohibited from purchasing telecommunications or computing equipment from any U.S company or from any U.S. subsidiary abroad. From 1962 to 1991 such technologies had to be obtained from the Soviet bloc. U.S. scientists and professionals in the computer field were and continue to be seldom issued licenses by the U.S. Treasury Department to travel to Cuba.[18] When e-mail was first developed by the United States military Cuba had no access to such services, nor to the technical know how or the equipment. Until May 1994 access to U.S. Internet sites was blocked under a National Science Foundation (NSF) "route-filtering" policy through which the United States government did not allow NSFNet or any other Internet network to provide traffic (back and forth) from Cuba. Consequently, Cuba could not engage in Internet activity. In July 1994 the U.S. Treasury Department decided that the transfer of data and information to Cuba by any U.S. carrier could take place, as long as it did not involve any transfer of money from the U.S. to Cuba. The intent was to put into effect the 1992 Torricelli Act that defined communications with Cuba as a way to undermine the revolutionary regime.[19] By October 1994 the U.S. Federal Communications Commission approved agreements between the Cuban telephone enterprise and U.S. telephone companies to offer direct phone service between the two countries, and such direct service commenced in November of that year. However, this agreement did not include data transfer. At the time there was no direct phone service between the two countries. On January 12, 1995 InterNIC (a cooperative U.S. based project that handles the registration of networks joining the Internet) granted a Cuban institution (CENIAI) a Class B Internet address, allowing Cuba to directly join the Internet.[20] It should be noted, however, that although the United States government lifted the main restriction on Cuban connectivity, it is not up to Cuba to simply connect to the Internet at whatever speed it may wish to do so, or with as many channels and independent providers as it may choose. To date, any time Cuba attempts to add a new channel to the Internet, the U.S. counterpart has to obtain the approriate license from the U.S. Treasury Department. Likewise, if a U.S. company wants to open a new channel to Cuba or decides to increase the speed of the connection, a license must first be issued. The Cuban national director of Internet norms and regulations has remarked that the present connection with Internet does not offer the appropriate bandwidth to meet the country's demand.[21] One author has noted "the U.S. trade embargo forces Cuba to use an expensive, sluggish satellite connection and bandwidth."[22] There is neither a T1, T3 or DSL link ups between Cuba and the outside world.[23] Larry Press has noted that as of the spring of 1999, Cuba's total international bandwidth was only 832 kb/s, "less than a home with high-speed DSL service or cable modem and less than 1/50th of the bandwidth from my campus of the California State University to the Internet."[24] The problem could be greatly alleviated if a fiber optic cable between Cuba and the state of Florida was used, but the U.S. has not allowed such.[25] In 1999 one U.S. company which has laid cables connecting several Caribbean islands proposed to lay an underwater fiber optic cable capable of handling 530,000 simultaneous connections at 40 Gbps.[26] But the process of obtaining a U.S. government license was considered so cumbersome and expensive that the company gave up. In spite of previous Treasury approval in principle of data traffic, observers doubted that the U.S. would approve a link intended exclusively for such use.[27] Cuba on the other hand has expressed its willingness to connect to such a cable, and in November 15, 1999 signed the necessary protocol documents with a commercial consortia to permit the link to the Arcos 1 fiber optic submarine network. [28] INTERNET PROVIDFERS AND HOSTS Cuba's 1996 connection to the Internet via CENIAI established a link at 64kb/s through U.S. Sprint (Global One).[29] Two years later its speed increased to 256K. Italy also began to provide two international channels at 256K (via Sea Bone). In 1999 Canada's Teleglobe initiated a 512K asymmetric service.[30] As of 2001 there are 5 national Internet service providers in the island, linking 312 Internet sites linked to those major providers.[31] In May 2001 there were 548 registered *.cu domains in Cuba of which: 139 are commercial (.com), 8 are organizational (*.org), 21 are educational (*.edu), 20 are informational (*.inf), 10 are governmental (*.gov), and 3 are *.net.[32] There are 44 other domains with licenses pending.[33] Cuba has at least 151 licensed intranets for data retrieval. Overall, the number of Internet hosts in January 2001 numbered 702, four months later they reached 1100.[34] The World Bank estimated that in 1999 the there were 0.06 Internet hosts for every 10,000 persons in Cuba.[35] There are numerous unofficial estimates of the number of Internet users in Cuba today. The United States government and Cuban exile sources offer the low figure of 2000 Internet accounts.[36] A recent journalistic report declared that, "On this island of 11 million, the Ministry of Communications and Information reported about 3,600 permanent Internet accounts through four government-operated providers." [37] However, it was not reported whether the number of accounts and the number of users coincided. The highly respected Nua Internet Surveys estimated that the number of online users in Cuba in April 2000 reached 60,000 or 0.54% of the total population.[38] That figure, however, included both Internet and email users. A more realistic estimate would be to state that there are about 25,000 Internet accounts but, as a rule, two or more persons use each of those accounts.[39] Each account is, really, a shared account - a strategy found throughout the developing world. The majority of such accounts are institutional. According to Melchor Gil Morel, Vice Minister of Informatics and Communications, the number of e-mail accounts (not to be confused with the real number of users) is about 60,000.[40] Officially, it has been noted that today the country's e-mail communications program meets 42 percent of the total social demand, compared with 17 percent only a few years ago.[41] COMPUTER AND TELEPHONE INFRASTRUCTURE: THE UPPER LIMITS OF INTERNET ACCESS PCs in Cuba A report by the International Telecommunication Union notes, "Telephone lines and personal computers are key components for Internet access. Both have significant impact on the take-up of Internet in a country. Dial-up Internet access requires a telephone line and a personal computer (with a modem). These hardware components thus constitute an upper limit for Internet access. For example, if 25 percent of households have personal computers with modems, then Internet access from households cannot exceed 25 percent. Internet policies will not be successful if they do not address these fundamental access requirements."[42] PCs are not a common household resource in the developing world. In the U.S. there is one PC for every three persons but in Brazil the ratio becomes 1:143. In 1991, at the time of the demise of the USSR, Cuba had just 15,000 PCs for the entire country.[43] As of September 2000 there were 1.8 computers per 100 inhabitants in Cuba. The number of computers has increased, since 1995, on a yearly average by 25,000. Each of these computers costs approximately $1,300, a price tag that very few households could afford. Over 90% of all new PCs are purchased by the state for social use.[44] Currently within the Cuban educational system there are 39,000 computers distributed among 8,868 elementary schools and 1,887 secondary schools.[45] In the school year 2000-2001 twenty thousand new computers were added to the secondary school system.[46] The proportion of computers to university students is 1:12.[47] Footnotes: [1] U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion, On the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America. October 16, 2000, Washington, DC. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/index.html [2] Mohsen Tawfik, "Is The World Wide Web Really Worldwide?," UNESCO Points of View, Paris, 1999. http://www.unesco.org/webworld/points_of_views/tawfik_1.html [3] United Nations Development Program, Human Development Report Office, New Technologies and the Global Race for Knowledge, Geneva, 1999. Figure 2.4, Chapter 2. http://www.undp.org/hdro/Chapter2.pdf [4] Counting the Net: Internet Access Indicators. Prepared by Michael Minges. Presented at INET 2000, The Internet Global Summit, Yokohama, Japan, 18-21 July 2000. http://www.itu.int/ti/papers/inet2000/isoc2000.pdf [5] Eszter. Hargittai E., "Holes in the Net: The Internet and International Stratification", INET'98: The Internet Summit, 21-24th July 1998, Geneva, Switzerland. [6] International Labour Organization, World Employment Report 2001 Decent Work and Information and Communications Technologies, Washington, DC: Brookings Press, 2001. http://www.oit.org/public/english/support/publ/wer/index2.htm [7] United Nations, Report of the meeting of the high-level panel of experts on information and communication technology (New York, 17-20 April 2000, A/55/75 - E/2000/55. [8] Pippa Norris, "The Internet in Europe: A New North-South Divide?," Harvard International Journal of Press Politics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2000, p. 6. [9] Adam Rombel, "The Global Digital Divide," Global Finance (New York), December 2000. [10] Abraham F. Lowenthal, "Latin America at the Century's End," Journal of Democracy, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2000, p. 42. [11] Margalit Edelman and Peter Mountford, A Telecom Scorecard 1999-2000: Consumer costs for Basic Services in the Americas, Alexis de Tocqueville Institution, 2000; Inter American Development Bank, Information Technology for Development Division, Electronic Commerce and Development Implications for UDB Action, Antonio Ca'Zorzi, November 2000, Washington, DC; "Nerd Nation," Latin Trade, New York, Mar 2001 [12] Graham Makohoniuk, "Brave new region," Latinfinance (Coral Gables), February 2001, pp. 24-25. [13] Alberto Chong and Alejandro Micco, On Information Technology and Competitiveness, in Latin America, Prepared for the seminar "Towards Competitiveness: The Institutional Path" Annual Meetings of the Board of Governors, Inter-American Development Bank and Inter-American Investment Corporation, Santiago, Chile, March 16, 2001. http://www.iadb.org/oce/pdf/infotech.pdf#xml=http://www.iadb.org/search97cgi/s97is.dll?action=View&VdkVgwKey=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eiadb%2Eorg%2Foce%2Fpdf%2Finfotech%2Epdf&doctype=xml&Collection=newcoll&QueryZip=Alberto+Chong+and+Alejandro+Micco& [14] "El Crecimiento de Internet en Latinoamérica Irá en Aumento," EFE (Madrid), October 10, 2000; "América Latina estará a la cabeza de los nuevos usuarios de Internet," El Nuevo Herald (Miami), February 20, 2001. [15] United Nations Development Program, Human Development Report Office, New Technologies and the Global Race for Knowledge, Geneva, 1999. [16] Centro de Investigaciones de la Economía Mundial, Investigación sobre el desarrollo humano y equidad en Cuba - 1999, La Habana: Caguayo, S.A. This study was funded by the United Nations Development Program. [17] Ann C. Seror and Juan Miguel Fach Arteaga, "Telecommunications Technology Transfer and the Development of Institutional Infrastructure: The Case of Cuba," Telecommunications Policy, vol. 24 (2000), pp. 203-21. [18] U.S. foreign policy on Cuba is based on "two tracks." Track 1 involves an overall embargo on trade or any commercial transaction. Track 2 allows for contact and exchanges (including "people to people" and academic exchanges). But Track 2 does not include exchanges among professionals in the hard sciences. For a discussion of the policy: Fidel Castro, Speech on July 26, 1995 at Guantánamo. [19] Nelson P Valdés and Mario A. Rivera, "The Political Economy of the Internet in Cuba," Cuba in Transition, Vol. 9, 1999, pp. 145-146. [20] Ibid. Communication from Jesús Martínez Alfonso, CENIAI Director to Nelson P Valdés, February 21, 1995. [21] "Páginas cubanas en Internet registran casi 50 millones de accesos," Prensa Latina (Havana), February 2, 2001; "Impedimentos técnicos condicionan a Cuba su acceso a Internet," EFE (Madrid), March 3, 2001. [22] Julia Scheeres "Cuba not so libre with the net," Wired News, February 23, 2001. [23] 7. CIA World Factbook 2000 http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/cu.html [24] Larry Press, "The State of the Internet: Growth and Gaps," paper presented at the INET 2000 Conference, 18-21 July 2000, Yokohama, Japan. See also: Martinez, Jesus "The Net in Cuba," Matrix News, Vol. 1, No. 1, January 1999. [25] "Questioning the Dotcom Revolution," Christian Science Monitor, February 12, 2001, [26] "Quest Net Corp. to Begin Construction on 40 Gbps Cuban Undersea Cable Network, " Telecom News Archive, March 12, 1999. [27] "Project to Build Fiber Optic Link to Cuba is Abandoned," CubaNews, March 2000, p. 6. [28] Remarks by Dr. Fidel Castro Ruz at the Round Table discussion, Televisión Cubana studios, June 19th, 2001. [29] CENIAI stands for Centro de Intercambio Automatizado de Información, which belongs to the Instituto de Documentación e Información Tecnológica (IDICT) of the Information Agency for Development which is part of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment. "Cuba asegura que aumentará servicio de Internet a población," AP, March 2, 2001. [30] Matrix News, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 1999. [31] "Por el Día de la Prensa Cubana: Sitio web de los periodistas cubanos en Internet," Granma (Havana) 12/03/01. [32] Centro Cubano de Información de Red, Lista completa de dominios inscritos, May 25, 2001. http://www.nic.cu/consult.html [33] Centro Cubano de Información de Red, Lista de solicitudes en trámite, Havana, Cuba, May 25, 2001. [34] Network Wizards - Internet Software Consortium, Distribution by Top-Level Domain Name by Name, January 2001. http://www.isc.org/ds/WWW-200101/dist-byname.html. The May 2001 has been provided to the author by a Cuban news agency. [35] World Bank, World Development Indicators 2000, New York, 2001. Table 5.11. http://www.worldbank.org/data/wdi2000/pdfs/tab5_11.pdf [36] "Cuba tiende la cortina de hierro por la Internet," Nuevo Herald (Miami), October 9, 2000. [37] Vanessa Bauzá, "Cubans Learn How to Use Computers," Sun-Sentinel, March 1, 2001. [38] http://www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/s_america.html [39 Communication from ETECSA to Centro de Información de Prensa, Havana, August 7, 2000. [40] Miguel de la Guardia, "Internet: un medio idóneo para propagar la verdad," Radio Habana Cuba, March 12, 2001; [41] "Expanding Internet Service to meet Cuba's Most Pressing Needs," Radio Havana Cuba, March 12, 2001. [42] Michael Minges, Counting the Net: Internet Access Indicators, Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, 2000 [43] Speech by Cuban President Fidel Castro at the opening of the Youth Club Computer and Electronics Center in Havana, Cubavisión Television (Havana), March 7, 1991. [44] Report by Cuba's Deputy Minister for Telecommunications and Electronics, Melchor Gil, Press Conference, Havana, March 15, 2001. [45] "Dispondrán de 14 000 computadoras centros educacionales cubanos de enseñanza media," Granma (Havana) February 28, 2001. [46] Alberto Núñez Betancourt,"Fidel reinaugura Joven Club Central de Computación," Granma Internacional (Havana) April 5, 2001. [47] Inter American Commission on Human Rights, Annual Report 2000, Washington, DC, Section 65. [To be continued]
CUBA-L FAIR USE NOTICE
This server contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of Cuba's political, economic, human rights, international, cultural, educational, scientific, sports and historical issues, among others. We distribute the materials on the basis of a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. The material is distributed without profit. The material should be used for information, research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/17/107.shtml.